The Original I Ching
esenfr
← all experiments
斐 · independent sets of Q6

Fibonacci in the hexagram

Counting with no two adjacent yin lines draws the sequence

Walk the ladder and let the colour explain the recurrence, or open the Venn: only Ji Ji and Wei Ji remain.

Original finding
Two honest disclaimers

It is a counting theorem, not a hidden code. The numerology circulating about Fibonacci and the I Ching (hand-picked offsets, trading retracement levels, the golden ratio hidden in the King Wen ordering) is left out as undemonstrable: here there are only sets that get counted and turn out to be a Fibonacci number. The only φ that appears is the real limit of those counts, not an imposed pattern.

As far as we know, this verified formulation over the hexagrams (the survivors as independent sets of the path P6 and of the cycle C6) is not published anywhere else. We say it with that exact humility: we have not found the source, not that it does not exist.

Every new line doubles the population (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64), but the figures with no two adjacent yin only grow like Fibonacci (2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21). The colour shows why: those ending in yang come from the previous row, and those ending in yin come from two rows back. Blues plus greens of one row = the live ones of the two rows above: F(n+2) = F(n+1) + F(n), in plain sight.

1 line2 / 2F(3)2 lines3 / 4F(4)3 lines5 / 8F(5)4 lines8 / 16F(6)5 lines13 / 32F(7)6 lines21 / 64F(8)×1.500×1.667×1.600×1.625×1.615 → φ = 1.618…

Grey: figures with two adjacent yin (eliminated). The right-hand column compares survivors against the total population and their ratio between rows.

21
no two yin = F(8)
18
circular = Lucas L(6)
2
alternation (Wèi Jì, Jì Jì)
19+19+2+24
the Venn regions = 64

The 21 survivors per rule are the independent sets of P6; in the circular version, of C6. Everything is counted, nothing is hard-wired.